English

Vol. 10 6, 2020 p 663-673

Pages

Article name, authors, abstract and keyword

663-673

Methods of risk assessment in forecasting the consequences of accidents at pipeline transport facilities

Vladislav N. Slepnev a, Alexander F. Maksimenko b, Elena V. Glebova b, Alla . Volokhina b

a Pipeline Transport Institute, LLC (Transneft R&D, LLC), 47a Sevastopolsky Prospect, Moscow, 117186, Russian Federation
b Gubkin Russian State University of Oil and Gas (National Research University), 65 Leninsky Prospect, Moscow, 119991, Russian Federation

DOI: 10.28999/2541-9595-2020-10-6-663-673

Abstract: The choice of risk assessment procedure is one of the essential stages of efficient structuring of processes on prevention, localization and elimination of the consequences of accidents at main pipeline transport facilities. The authors analyzed themed publications and regulatory documents, governing procedures of risk assessment and forecasting of the consequences of possible accidents, and defined main problems in this area. Procedure for the risk assessment of accidents at main pipeline facilities was developed, the basis of which is the expert evaluation method. The procedure includes the determination of the main criteria for the assessment the probability of accident initiation and development and the evaluation of the severity of its consequences, an expert evaluation of criteria significance, their classification, and creation of a rating for hazardous pipeline sections. The application of the procedure application allows to specify the list of facilities that require high priority forecasting of accidents consequences, thus to optimize the distribution of resources and the overall increase of efficiency in planning while defining forces and special technical devices, necessary for containment and rectification of emergencies. Expert evaluation method application allows considering the specifics of certain enterprises, their technical and technological peculiarities, thereby increasing forecasting accuracy.

Keywords: accident localization, elimination of accident consequences, hazardous production facility, industrial safety, oil spill, risk of accidents, risk assessment procedure, quality management system.

For citation:
Slepnev V. N., Maksimenko A. F., Glebova E. V., Volokhina . . Methods of risk assessment in forecasting the consequences of accidents at pipeline transport facilities. Nauka i tehnologii truboprovodnogo transporta nefti i nefteproduktovScience & Technologies: Oil and Oil Products Pipeline Transportation. 2020;10(6):663673.

References:
[1] Slepnev V. N., Maksimenko A. F. The basic principles of building a quality management system for prevention, localization and liquidation of effects of accidents at pipeline transport facilities. Nauka i tehnologii truboprovodnogo transporta nefti i nefteproduktovScience & Technologies: Oil and Oil Products Pipeline Transportation. 2018;8(4):456468. (In Russ.)
[2] Slepnev V. N., Maksimenko A. F. Organizing the quality management system for the processes of prevention, localization and elimination of accidents at pipeline transport facilities. Neftyanoe khozyajstvo = Oil Industry. 2019(2):106111. (In Russ.)
[3] Grajdankin . I., Lisanov . V., Pecherkin . S., Sidorov V. I. Typical errors of accident risk analysis during industrial safety declaration. Bezopasnost truda v promyshlennosti = Occupational Safety in Industry. 2004(10):612. (In Russ.)
[4] Marukhlenko S. L., Degtyarev S. V. The system analysis in the solution of tasks of the analysis of risk of negative impact of technogenic failures. Proceedings of the southwest state university. series: control, computer engineering, information science. medical instruments engineering. 2012(22):3337. (In Russ.)
[5] Smogunov V. V., Vershinin N. N., Avdonina L. . Systemic and synergetic approach to risk analysis. Proceedings of international symposium Reliability and quality. 2009 May 15; Penza, Russian Federation. Penza: Penza State University Publ.; 2009. Vol. 1. P. 6567. (In Russ.)
[6] Fedosov A. V., Mannanova G. R., Shipilova Y. A. The analysis of dangers, assessment of risk of accidents on hazardous production facility and the recommendation about the choice of methods of the analysis of risk. Oil and Gas Business: The electronic scientific journal. 2016(3):322336. (In Russ.)
[7] Suarez H., Finkelshteyn ., Lisanov . V., Kruchinina I. . Foreign experience of using a risk-oriented approach in the operation of technical devices at oil and gas facilities. Bezopasnost truda v promyshlennosti = Occupational Safety in Industry. 2015(8):2430. (In Russ.)
[8] Zheltikov . N., Bogdanova L. ., Ganaga S. V., Kovalev S. ., Ovcharov S. V. Comparison of results of potential risk calculation for accidents at main gas pipelines, performed using Phast Risk software package and as per Gazprom PJSC procedure. Bezopasnost truda v promyshlennosti = Occupational Safety in Industry. 2012(5):6973. (In Russ.)
[9] Raiffa H. Howard decision analysis. Moscow: Nauka Publ.; 1977. 407 p. (In Russ.)
[10] Bestuzhev-Lada I. V. Workbook on forecasting. Moscow: Misl Publ.; 1982. 430 p. (In Russ.)
[11] Mushik E., Muller P. Methods of making technical decisions. Moscow: Mir Publ.; 1990. 208 p. (In Russ.)
[12] Orlov . I. Organizational and economic modeling: textbook: in 3 parts. oscow: Publishing house of Bauman Moscow State Technical University; 2009. Part 2: Expert assessments. 2011. 486 p. (In Russ.)
[13] Orlov . I. Sustainability in social and economic models. Moscow: Nauka Publ.; 1979. 296 p. (In Russ.)
[14] Polovkov S. A., Gonchar A. E., Maksimenko A. F., Slepnev V. N. Assessment of the risk of damage to pipelines located in the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation. Modeling of a spill and determination of the possible volume of oil taking surface topography into consideration. Oil and gas territory. 2016(12):8893. (In Russ.)
[15] Aysmatullin I. R., Veretelnik D. ., Slepnev V. N., Shestakov R. Y. A systematic approach to protection of the Arctic from the consequences of accidents on main pipelines. Business magazine Neftegaz.ru. 2018(5):6672. (In Russ.)